Valine v. Muniz
| Daniel Joseph Valine |
| William L. Muniz |
| 2:2016cv01027 |
| May 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM DECISION signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 07/12/17 ORDERING that the Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. The Court DECLINES to issue COA. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 3/23/2017 ADOPTING IN FULL 19 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 13 Motion to Dismiss as moot; DENYING 2 Motion to Stay as moot; ORDERING that this action proceed on the petitioner's first, fourth, and fifth claims; DISMISSING all other claims without prejudice. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
19
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/13/17 RECOMMENDING that Respondent's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 13 ) be denied as moot. The motion to stay (ECF No. 2 ), which was predicated on this petition bei ng mixed, be denied as moot; This action proceed only on petitioner's first, fourth, and fifth claims. These are, specifically, that: (1) he was convicted by the testimony of an accomplice that was not sufficiently corroborated; (4) that his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective in failing to object before and during the trial to the unlawful search and seizure of petitioner's cell phone text records; and (5) that the Sacramento County Sheriff unlawfully obtained a state ment from Justine Valine by interrogating him while he was not in his right state of mind. All other claims contained in the petition should be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/31/16 ordering petitioner shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk of the court shall send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Valine v. Muniz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Daniel Joseph Valine | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: William L. Muniz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
