Winegarner v. Rite Aid Corporation
Caren Winegarner |
Rite Aid Corporation |
2:2016cv01028 |
May 16, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Placer |
Edmund F. Brennan |
John A. Mendez |
Other Labor Litigation |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/12/2018 ORDERING that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each sideto bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. (Washington, S) |
Filing 38 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/26/2018 GRANTING 26 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (York, M) |
Filing 32 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/19/18, ORDERING that the Court's 30 Minute Order is hereby VACATED. Rite Aid's 26 Motion for partial summary judgment is SET for hearing on 2/13/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. Rite Aid's reply is due 14 days prior to the hearing. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 25 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/12/17 ORDERING that the deadlines are EXTENDED as follows: The close of Discovery is EXTENDED from 9/29/17, to 12/29/2017; The Dispositive Motion deadline is EXTENDED from 12/8/17, to 3/8/2018. The dispositive Motion hearing date is CONTINUED from 1/9/18, to 4/9/18. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 23 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/25/2017 FINDING that this action is related to the action denominated 2:17-cv-01527 MCE CKD within the meaning of Local Rule 123; REASSIGNING the related case to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings. (Michel, G.) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/14/2017 ORDERING that discovery be completed by 9/29/2017; ORDERING that dispositive motions be filed by 12/8/2017 and noticed for hearing on 1/9/2018. (Michel, G.) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/21/17 ORDERING that the deadlines in the following cases are extended as follows: the close of Discovery is EXTENDED from 4/28/17, to 7/28/17; the Dispositive Motion deadline is EXT ENDED from 7/11/17, to 10/10/17; and the Dispositive Motion Hearing date is CONTINUED from 8/8/17, to 11/7/17 at 1:30 p.m. This order applies only to the following related cases: 2:13-CV-02439 JAM-EFB; 2:14-CV-01946 JAM-EFB; 2:14-CV-01960 JAM -EFB; 2:15-CV-00623 JAM-EFB; 2:15-CV-02150 JAM-EFB; 2:15-CV-02396 JAM-EFB; 1:15-CV-01748 JAM-EFB; 2:15-CV-02597 JAM-EFB; 1:15-CV-01872 JAM-EFB; 1:15-CV-01874 JAM-EFB; 2:15-CV-02594 JAM-EFB; 2:16-CV-00174 JAM-EFB; 2:16-CV-00211 JAM-EFB; and 2:16-CV-01028 JAM-EFB. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 16 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/13/16. (Benson, A) |
Filing 14 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/21/2016 ORDERING that Rite Aid Corporation's objections to the Court's 6/9/2016 Status Order (Doc #47-Case #14-cv-1961) are OVERRULED. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 6 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/18/16 ORDERING that the District Judge assignment in the action denominated 2:16-CV-01028 TLN-EFB be reassigned to District Judge John A. Mendez for all further proceedings.Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as 2:16-CV-01028 JAM-EFB. (Becknal, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.