Lull et al v. County of Sacramento et al
| Christopher Lull and Autotek, Inc. |
| County of Sacramento, County of Sacramento Planning Department, County of Sacramento Building Department, County of Sacramento County Counsel Department, County of Sacramento Community Development Department, County of Sacramento Board of Supervisors, County of Sacramento Clerk of the Board, County of Sacramento Sheriff's Department, County of Sacramento Revenue Recovery Department, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Lori Moss, Leighann Moffitt, Brian Washko, Robin Rasmussen, Bob Ivie, John Muzinich, Scott Purvis, Wayne Eastman, June Powells-Mays, Tammy Derby, Paul Munoz, Cyndi Lee and Florence Evans |
| 2:2016cv01093 |
| May 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/30/2020 DENYING 94 Motion to Amend the Judgment. (Tupolo, A)
|
|
Filing
104
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/30/2020 that this case be related to case numbers 2:20-cv-0165-KJM-CKD (PS), 2:20-cv-1645-KJM-KJN (PS), 2:20-cv-1646-JAM-CKD (PS), and that the related cases be reassigned to Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller and Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney for all further proceedings. The Clerk shall make the appropriate adjustments in the case assignment. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/17/2020 DENYING plaintiffs' 68 motion for relief and 69 motion to amend. County defendants' 66 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in full. SMUD's 70 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in full. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of County defendants and SMUD. CASE CLOSED. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
87
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/24/20 ORDERING that this action is related with member case 2:20-cv-00165-JAM-EFB PS. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/12/2018 ORDERING that: this court DISMISSES plaintiffs tort claims against all County defendants,without leave to amend, and DISMISSES plaintiffs retaliation claim as pled against County defenda nts Lee and Evans, without leave to amend. The court DISMISSES plaintiffs equal protection claim against SMUD, with leave to amend, and DISMISSES plaintiffs unreasonable seizure claim against SMUD, without leave to amend and DENIES 44 and 47 Moti ons to Dismiss. As a result, only two claims remains: A due process claim against SMUD and aretaliation claim against all remaining County defendants except for Lee and Evans. Should plaintiffs elect to amend their equal protection claim against SMUD, they must do so within 14 days. (Hunt, G)
|
|
Filing
56
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/23/2018 ORDERING: Discovery due by 6/6/2018; Expert Disclosures due by 8/13/2018; Supplemental Expert Disclosures due by 9/3/2018; Completion of Expert Discovery due by 10/5/2018; Dispositive Motions heard no later than 11/2/2018; File Joint Pretrial Conference Statement VACATED; Final Pretrial Conference VACATED; Trial Briefs Due VACATED; and Jury Trial VACATED. (Hunt, G)
|
|
Filing
43
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/11/17: Defendants Manuel Mejia, Ben Green and Robert Logsdon are dismissed without prejudice. Count Nine of the Second Amended Complaint (Bane Act) is dismissed without prejudice. Count Twelve of the Second Amended Complaint (First Amendment Right of Access to the Court) is dismissed without prejudice. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
39
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/21/2017 ORDERING the defendants to respond to the 35 Second Amended Complaint by 10/13/2017. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
36
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/11/17 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint is now due no later than 9/8/17; Defendants have until 9/22/17, to respond to the Second Amended Complaint in any manner permitted by the FRCP. Plaintiffs' and the County Defendants' initial disclosures shall be served within fourteen days after the County Defendants file an answer to the complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/24/2017 GRANTING 16 7 Motions to Dismiss and decides the following: DISMISSES all claims against the County Planning Department, Building Code Department, County Counsel, Community Developm ent Department, Board of Supervisors, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Sheriffs Department, Department of Revenue Recovery, and all claims against the individual County employees in their official capacity, as duplicative to the County defendant; A BSTAINS from hearing plaintiffs' first, second, third and fourth claims until plaintiffs' related state court cases resolve; DISMISSES plaintiffs' fifth, eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh claims, without prejudice; DISMISSES plaintiffs' sixth claim, with prejudice; and GRANTS plaintiffs' request to amend the complaint within fourteen days of this order. (Washington, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
