Meyers v. County of Sacramento et al
| Glen Meyers |
| County of Sacramento, Sacramento Sheriff's Department, Scott Jones, Eric Maness, Jamie Lewis and Annmarie Boylan |
| 2:2016cv01121 |
| May 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Morrison C. England |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/11/20 ADOPTING 62 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/24/2020 ORDERING 64 that Dennise Henderson is SANCTIONED a total of $250.00 based upon the willful disobedience of this court's orders. Dennise Henderson shall pay $250.00 to the Clerk of Court within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/7/2020. Dennise Henderson is ordered to show cause within 14 days why she should not be sanctioned in the amount of $250. Further, plaintiff is advised that as a pro se li tigant he, and he alone, is responsible for filing court documents. Plaintiff is cautioned that unless an attorney enters an appearance on his behalf, no attorney is authorized to utilize the court's electronic filing system, and any further filings will be stricken. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send this Order to Dennise Henderson via ECF.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
62
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/15/2020 RECOMMENDING that Defendants' 42 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. The action be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. Motion referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 02/20/20 ORDERING that if attorneys Henderson and/or Barbee wish to represent plaintiff in this matter, they must conform to the Local Rules and the orders of the Court. Not later than 5 days, He nderson and Barbee shall SHOW CAUSE why they should not each be fined $250 for improper use of an ECF login/password. Furthermore, until Ms. Henderson files a standalone Notice of Appearance under her own ECF login and password, the Court will disregard any filings she purportedly makes on plaintiff's behalf. Clerk to serve Dennise Henderson and Stratton Barbee via ECF. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 01/14/20 RESETTING hearing on 42 Motion for Summary Judgment to 3/4/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. Plaintiff's opposition due 02/19/20; defendants' reply due 02/26/20. Plaintiff's 50 Motion to stay and plaintiff's 50 Request to conduct further discovery are both DENIED without prejudice. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/31/20 DIRECTING Stratton Barbee and Dennise Henderson to file a Notice of Appearance on plaintiff's behalf if they intend to continue representing plaintiff. If no notice of appearance is filed, the court will presume counsel is not representing plaintiff and will not act in that manner going forward. (cc Stratton Barbee & Dennise Henderson) (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/12/2019 ORDDERING 42 Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing is Reset for 1/22/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. Plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, due by 1/8/2020, and Reply, if any, due by 1/15/2020.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/9/2019 APPROVING request for authority to incur costs (appointed counsel) and request for payment. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/3/18 DENYING 29 Motion to Appoint Counsel without prejudice to renewal. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/7/18 ORDERING that No later than thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the parties shall file reports on the status of this litigation and any pertinent issues, including whether a settlement conference would be beneficial at this time; No later than thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the parties shall file proposed pretrial deadlines as described above.(Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/18/2018 GRANTING 20 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. All pending dates are VACATED. The Law Office of Dennise Henderson is relieved as counsel of record for Plaintiff effective upon the filing of proof of service of this signed Order on Plaintiff at his last known address: Glen Meyers-04289-010, FCI Terminal Island, P.O. Box 3007, San Pedro, CA 90733. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 3/20/2018 GRANTING 17 Motion to Modify or Vacate Scheduling order; Parties shall confer within 60 days; Discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, is due within 365 days; All other dates shall be calculated based on these changes and all other provisions shall remain in effect. (Fabillaran, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
