Johnson v. Pluralsight, LLC
| Kyle Johnson |
| Pluralsight, LLC |
| 2:2016cv01148 |
| May 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Morrison C. England |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/25/19 DISMISSING this CASE with prejudice Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the FRCP. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney's fees. The matter having now been concluded in its entirety, the Clerk of Court is directed to close the file. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/10/2019 EXTENDING 43 Plaintiff's time up to and including 10/2/2019 in which to serve responses to the Discovery Requests. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
42
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/20/2019 ORDERING plaintiff shall have a further extension of time, up to and including 9/2/2019, in which to serve responses to the Discovery Requests. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
40
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/24/19 GRANTING plaintiff until 8/16/19 to serve responses to the discovery requests. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 5/20/19 ORDERING that 25 Defendant Pluralsight's Motion for Involuntary Dismissal is DENIED. Plaintiff's 27 Motion to Amend Initial Scheduling Order is GRANTED. An amended PTSO will issue separately. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 4/18/17. CASE CLOSED(Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/16/2017 ORDERING that the Defendants' 5 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Plaintiff's First Cause of Action, brought directly under California's Automatic Purchase Renewa ls Statute, is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's Second Cause of Action, brought under the California's Unfair Competition Law, is also DISMISSED, but with leave to amend. Not later than 20 days following the date this Order is electro nically filed, Plaintiff may (but is not required to) file an amended complaint. If no amended complaint is filed, the causes of action dismissed by virtue of this order will be deemed DISMISSED with prejudice upon no further notice to the parties. (Jackson, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Pluralsight, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kyle Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Scott J. Ferrell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pluralsight, LLC | |
| Represented By: | John Anthony McMahon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
