Brown v. Kelly et al
| Keith Edward Brown |
| J. D. Ornelas and Danny Lecce |
| 2:2016cv01154 |
| May 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Allison Claire |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/13/16 ORDERING that THIS ACTION BE, AND HEREBY IS, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all claims, causes of action, and parties, with each party bearing that party's own attorney's fees and costs. The Clerk is directed to close the file. CASE CLOSED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/30/16: Plaintiff's motions for default judgment, preliminary injunction and judgment on the pleadings (ECF Nos. 12, 14, 16, 20), are DENIED without prejudi ce to their renewal in proper form. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendants Brian P. Kelly, Joseph Farrow, S.T. Dickson and Edmund G. Brown Jr., should be dismissed without prejudice and defendant Lecce's Motion To Dismiss (ECF No. 8), should be granted, and the action against him should be dismissed with prejudice. F&R referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections to F&R due within twenty one days. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/09/16 ORDERING that the 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; service is appropriate for defendants CHP Officer J.D. Ornelas #14807 and CHP Sergeant Danny Lecce; Clerk to send plaintiff 1 USM-28 5, 1 summons, an endorsed copy of the complaint, and an appropriate form for consent to trial by a magistrate judge for each defendant named above. If plaintiff elects to proceed against Ornelas and Lecce alone, then he must, within 30 days, submit service documents to the USM and then within 10 days thereafter, file a statement to the court regarding the submission to USM. If plaintiff elects to amend his complaint to state a cognizable claim against the remaining defendants, he has 30 days so to do. Plaintiff is not obligated to amend his complaint. (Benson, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
