Haney v. Johnson et al
Plaintiff: Monte L. Haney
Defendant: S. Johnson, Ramirez, B. Cross, C. Herring, D. Fields, S. Larios, G. Turner and E. Baker
Case Number: 2:2016cv01173
Filed: May 31, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Lassen
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Presiding Judge: Troy L. Nunley
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 117 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/25/20 DENYING 116 request for court assistance. (Plummer, M)
February 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 115 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/12/20 ORDERING that the concerns raised by plaintiff in his 112 01/21/20 letter are deemed resolved. (Benson, A.)
January 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 113 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/30/20 ORDERING that within 7 days from the date of this order, counsel for defendants shall inform the court whether plaintiff is being promptly returned to High Desert State Prison or his legal materials have been delivered to him. (Plummer, M)
October 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER AND WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/17/2019 ORDERING the custodian to produce Monte Haney #V-72062, to testify in USDC at 9:00 a.m. on 1/7/2020 in courtroom 25, before Magistrat e Judge Kendall J. Newman; custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ; and the Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Out-to-Court Desk and Warden. (cc: OTCD-SAC) (Yin, K)
September 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/11/19 ADOPTING 90 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendants' request for entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) 77 is DENIED. (Kaminski, H)
August 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 90 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/31/2019 RECOMMENDING 77 Request for Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Rule 54(b) be denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
February 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/20/19 GRANTING 70 Motion to modify the scheduling order. The parties may conduct discovery until 5/24/19. The pretrial conference set for 3/29/19 is vacated and reset for 9/27/19. Plaint iff shall file and serve his pretrial statement and any motions necessary to obtain the attendance of witnesses at trial on or before September 6, 2019; defendants pretrial statement is due on or before September 20, 2019. The jury trial set before the Honorable Troy L. Nunley for August 5, 2019, is vacated and reset for January 27, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. (Plummer, M)
February 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/01/19 DENYING 61 Motion for Extension of time and GRANTING 64 Motion to strike plaintiff's sur-reply. (Plummer, M)
January 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/17/2019 ADOPTING in FULL 57 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 45 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendants Ramirez, Cross, Herring, Fields, Larios, Turner, and Baker; and DENIED as to Defendant Johnson; DENYING 51 Motion to Stay Motion for Summary Judgment; (Washington, S)
October 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/17/2018 DENYING 43 Motion for Issuance of a Discovery Order; GRANTING 47 Motion to Stay Discovery; and RECOMMENDING 45 Motion for Summary Judgment be gr anted as to defendants Ramirez, Cross, Herring, Fields, Larios, Turner and Baker; defendants summary judgment motion be denied as to defendant Johnson; and 51 Motion to Stay Defendants' Summary Judgment Motion be denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
March 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/16/2018 ADOPTING 37 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 28 Motion to Require Plaintiff to Post a Security. Defendants shall file a response to the complaint within 30 days of the date this Order is filed. (York, M)
January 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/19/18 GRANTING 34 Motion for Protective Order. Neither party is required to respond to discovery requests until such time that a discovery/scheduling order is issued. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendants' motion to require plaintiff to post security 28 be denied. Motion to Require Plaintiff to Post Security 28 referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
October 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER ADOPTING 24 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/03/17 DENYING without prejudice 15 Defendants' Motion for Plaintiff to post security and Defendants Motion to revoke Plaintiff's IFP status. (Benson, A.)
March 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 24 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/22/2017 RECOMMENDING defendants' 15 motion for plaintiff to post security be denied without prejudice; defendants' 15 motion to revoke plaintiff's ifp status be granted; plaintiff be ordered to pay the filing fee within 30 days of the adoption of these findings and recommendations. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
February 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/10/17 ORDERING that plaintiff shall file the briefing within 21 days of the date of this order; defendants may file a reply within seven days thereafter.(Dillon, M)
January 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/20/17 GRANTING 17 Motion for Extension of time. Plaintiff's opposition, filed December 15, 2016, is deemed timely.(Dillon, M)
June 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/6/16 ORDERING the Director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the trust account of Monte L. Haney and forward payment to the court until the balance is paid in full. Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff's signed in forma pauperis affidavit to the Director of the CDC; and the Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the court. (cc CDC, Financial) (Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haney v. Johnson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Monte L. Haney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ramirez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B. Cross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Herring
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Fields
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Larios
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G. Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?