Hernandez v. Lynch
Petitioner: Esteban Hernandez
Respondent: Loretta Lynch
Case Number: 2:2016cv01192
Filed: June 2, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Troy L. Nunley
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 8 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/20/2017 ORDERING that this case be returned to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. CASE CLOSED (cc: USCA) (Washington, S)
October 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 29 PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/11/17. (Kaminski, H)
July 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/11/17 ORDERING that the scheduling order is modified, that all discovery shall be completed by 11/29/2017, and that dispositive motions shall be heard no later than 2/22/2018. (Kastilahn, A)
June 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER of USCA: The Court finds that a genuine issue of material fact exist as to petitioner's claim of US Citizenship. Accordingly, the case is TRANSFERRED to the US District Court, Eastern District of California, for a de novo review of petitioner's citizenship claim. The clerk shall enter an order to appoint counsel for the purpose of representing petitioner in the district court proceedings. (cc Kurt Heiser) (Donati, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?