Johnson v. Davey
Petitioner: Doshmen Johnson
Respondent: Dave Davey
Case Number: 2:2016cv01362
Filed: June 17, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K. Delaney
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 9/3/2021 FINDING that the Court is without jurisdiction to consider a motion for relief under Rule 60(b) based on the new evidence adduced at the evidentiary hearing on his state habeas petition. It is therefore ORDERED that the Court DECLINES to issue an indicative ruling that it would entertain a Rule 60(b) motion upon remand. A motion for an indicative ruling is not appealable. In an abundance of caution, the Court also DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability as to this Order. Any further relief must be addressed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Huang, H)
April 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 4/19/2018 GRANTING 31 Motion to Proceed on Appeal in IFP. (Fabillaran, J)
April 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM DECISION signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 4/10/2018 DENYING 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court DECLINES to issue a Certificate of Appealability. Any further request for a Certificate of Appealability must be addressed to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. CASE CLOSED. (York, M)
September 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/19/16 ORDERING that the court having reviewed the Marsden transcript received from the California Court of Appeal, and the parties having so stipulated, the transcript will be unsealed and copies transmitted to the parties. In addition, it is ORDERED that the response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus is due 30 days after that transmission. (Dillon, M)
September 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 09/07/16 ordering that respondent shall file a response to the petition no later than 30 days from the date of this order. As set forth in the 6/27/16 order, petitioner's response to respondent's filing is due 30 days thereafter. (Plummer, M)
July 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/14/16 DENYING without prejudice 10 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Davey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dave Davey
Represented By: David Andrew Eldridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Doshmen Johnson
Represented By: Juliana Drous
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?