Melger v. California Department of Corrections et al
| Thomas Joseph Melger |
| Colon, Shelton, Esculera, Prevostin and Bach |
| 2:2016cv01452 |
| June 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/16/2018 ORDERING defendants to notify this court, within 7 days, whether they have any objections to the dismissal of this action. Should defendants fail to respond, plaintiff's 56 request will be granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 06/25/18 GRANTING 39 plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint; GRANTING 52 plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint; DENYING 35 plaintiff� 39;s motion to appoint counsel; DENYING 37 plaintiff's motion to waive filing fees and DENYING 49 plaintiff's motion to shorten time. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff, together with a copy of this order, a copy of the current docket in this action. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 05/30/18 ORDERING the actions denominated as 2:18-cv-0019 KJM EFB P and 2:18-cv-1044 MCE AC P are reassigned to the undersigned for all further proceedings and any dates currently set in the reassig ned cases only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as No. 2:18-cv-0019 KJM DB and 2:18-cv-1044 MCE DB. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/20/17 ORDERING that plaintiff's motion to amend (ECF No. 14 ) is DENIED; Plaintiff's motion to be excused from exhausting administrative remedies (ECF No. 16 ) is DENIED as moot; and plaintiff shall, within 30 days of this order, file an amended complaint that complies with Judge Newman's initial screening order (ECF No. 9 ) entered on July 21, 2016.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/21/16 ORDERING the Director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the trust account of Thomas Joseph Melger and forward payment to the court until the balance is paid in full. Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff's signed in forma pauperis affidavit to the Director of the CDC; and the Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the court. (cc CDC, Financial)(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/6/16 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by t he Clerk of Court; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; and plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
