Trujillo v. Nofsinger
Skyler Trujillo |
Nofsinger |
2:2016cv01456 |
June 27, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Deborah Barnes |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/26/18 DIRECTING the clerk to randomly assign a district judge. District Judge Troy L. Nunley added. It is further RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days of being served with these findings and recommendations. New Case Number: 2:16-cv-1456-TLN-DB (PC). (Coll, A) |
Filing 11 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/25/18 ORDERING that within fourteen days of the date of this order plaintiff shall complete and return the attached form notifying the court whether he wants to proceed on the screened complaint or file an amended complaint.. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/25/18 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. All fees shall be collected in accordance with the court's CDC order filed concurrently herewith. Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment medical claim is dismissed with leave to amend for failure to identify the individual(s) involved. Plaintiffs claim that he was denied due process and was subject to retaliation is d ismissed with leave to amend for failure to allege sufficient facts to state a claim and failure to identify the individuals involved in the alleged deprivations. Plaintiff has the option to proceed immediately with only his Eighth Amendment excessiv e force claim against defendant Nofsinger as set forth in Section II above, or to amend the complaint. Within fourteen days of service of this order, plaintiff shall complete and return the attached form notifying the court whether he wants to proceed on the screened complaint or whether he wants to file a first amended complaint.. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 7 [DISREGARD, FILED IN WRONG CASE] ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Skyler Trujillo signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/27/2017. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in m onthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K) Modified on 9/28/2017 (Yin, K). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Trujillo v. Nofsinger | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Skyler Trujillo | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nofsinger | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.