Casborn v. Gower
| Terrol Casborn |
| R.L. Gower |
| 2:2016cv01506 |
| June 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER, AMENDED FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/7/2017 VACATING the 30 findings and recommendations filed on 5/26/2017. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that respondent's 20 motion to dismiss be granted; and the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied with prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K) Modified on 8/7/2017 (Yin, K).
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/6/2017 GRANTING petitioner's 31 request for a copy of the findings and recommendations and the Clerk shall provide petitioner with a copy of the 5/26/2017 findings and recommendations. Petitioner shall have 21 days to file objections to F&R and address whether a certificate of appealability should issue. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
30
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/26/2017 RECOMMENDING that Respondent's 20 motion to dismiss be granted. The 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied with prejudice. Motion referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/29/16 GRANTING 16 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Respondent may file an answer or otherwise respond to the petition up to and including February 17, 2017. Petitioner's response shall be filed within 30 days of the date the response is filed.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/13/2016 ORDERING that Petitioner's 9 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. Petitioner's 10 Motion for Extension is DENIED as moot. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/7/16 ORDERING that petitioner shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Transferring Case to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/1/16. New Case Number 2:16-cv-01506-CKD. Old Case Number 1:16-cv-00947-MJS. (Gonzalez, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Casborn v. Gower | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Terrol Casborn | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: R.L. Gower | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
