Barker et al v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
Plaintiff: Bill Barker, Tab Bachman and William Yingling
Defendant: Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
Case Number: 2:2016cv01532
Filed: July 5, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K. Delaney
Presiding Judge: Troy L. Nunley
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/3/2022 GRANTING 94 Request for dismissal. This action is DISMISSED, with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorney's fees, unless provided otherwise in the settlement agreement in Fritsch et al. v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Case No. 5:17-cv-02226 VAP (KKx) (C.D. Cal.) CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/21/2020 LIFTING the stay re rulings on 32 Motion to Certify Class; Motion for Conditional Certification and 39 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The motions are deemed submitted and the Court will issue rulings on the pending motions. The parties are to advise the Court if they reach a settlement of this action. (Zignago, K.)
April 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/14/2020 STAYING the ruling on Plaintiffs' 32 motion for class certification and motion for conditional certification, and Defendants' 39 motion for partial summary judgment pending the outcome of mediation. The parties are to advise the Court the results of mediation within 10 days of the conclusion of the mediation, on or before 12/18/2020.(Becknal, R)
January 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/30/2020 DENYING 57 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay proceedings pending an outcome in Fritsch. (Reader, L)
March 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 60 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/15/2018 ORDERING all proceedings in this case shall be STAYED pending the mediation on 4/24/2018. CASE STAYED. (Fabillaran, J)
December 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 44 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/01/17 ORDERING that Discovery cut-off for the limited purpose of resolving the ongoing discovery dispute regarding Plaintiffs' challenged discovery responses is EXTENDED to 12/1/2017. (Benson, A.)
October 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 37 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/27/2017 ORDERING Discovery cut-off for the limited purpose of resolving the ongoing discovery dispute regarding Plaintiffs' challenged discovery responses is EXTENDED to 11/10/2017. (Washington, S)
September 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 35 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/21/17, ORDERING that Swift's SupplementalList of Expert Witnesses (if any) due on 10/27/2017. Swift's Response toPlaintiffs' Motions for Class and Conditional Cert ification due on 11/17/2017. Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of their Motions for Class and Conditional Certification due on 12/11/2017. Hearing on Plaintiffs' Motions for Class andConditional Certification is SET for 1/11/2018 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Discovery Cut-Off for the limited purpose of resolving is 10/27/2017. (Kastilahn, A)
September 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/13/2017 CONTINUING discovery cut-off for the limited purpose of resolving the ongoing discovery dispute to 9/21/2017. (Michel, G.)
August 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 29 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/8/2017 ORDERING that discovery for the limited purpose of filing a motion related to the testimony at the Rule 30(B)(6) deposition of Swift on 8/25/2017 be completed by 9/8/2017; ORDE RING that discovery for the limited purpose of resolving the ongoing discovery dispute regarding the plaintiffs' challenged discovery responses, and the defendant's third supplemental response to the plaintiffs' request for production of documents, set one be completed by 9/11/2017; ORDERING all parties to disclose expert witnesses by 9/8/2017. (Michel, G.)
May 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/30/2017 ORDERING Discovery set for 6/1/2017 is VACATED and CONTINUED to 7/31/2017. (Reader, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barker et al v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bill Barker
Represented By: David Roger Markham
Represented By: Russel David Myrick
Represented By: Maggie K. Realin
Represented By: Binyomin Travis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tab Bachman
Represented By: David Roger Markham
Represented By: Russel David Myrick
Represented By: Maggie K. Realin
Represented By: Binyomin Travis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Yingling
Represented By: David Roger Markham
Represented By: Russel David Myrick
Represented By: Maggie K. Realin
Represented By: Binyomin Travis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
Represented By: Christopher Chad McNatt, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?