Ryder v. Commissioner of Social Security
Sharon Ryder |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2016cv01535 |
July 6, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Craig M. Kellison |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/8/2018 ORDERING that Sharon Ryder be AWARDED attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $7,258.00 under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28:2412(d); this amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28:1920; 2412(d). (Reader, L) |
Filing 24 ORDER adopting in full 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/20/18. Plaintiff's 15 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Defendant's 18 cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The matter is REMANDED for further proceedings. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 22 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 09/28/17 RECOMMENDING that plaintiffs motion for summary judgment 15 be granted. Defendants cross-motion for summary judgment 18 be denied. This matter be remanded for further proceedings. Motions 15 and 18 referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/2/2017 ORDERING that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 4/12/2017. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/18/2017 ORDERING that the Plaintiff's time to file a motion for summary judgment is hereby EXTENDED to the new filing date of 2/13/2017. (Jackson, T) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting 2 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/7/16. The Clerk is directed to serve on plaintiff the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases. The Clerk is further directed to ser ve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal (USM). Within 15 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM a completed summons and copies of the complaint and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM. The USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (Kastilahn, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ryder v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sharon Ryder | |
Represented By: | Peter Brixie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Marcelo N. Illarmo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.