Gray v. Muniz
| Oliver Gray |
| W.L. Muniz |
| 2:2016cv01577 |
| July 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John A. Mendez |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/26/2020 ADOPTING 55 Findings and Recommendations in full. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; and The court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
55
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/25/20 RECOMMENDING that petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/16/2018 DENYING without prejudice petitioner's 49 motion for discovery. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/28/2018 GRANTING 45 Request to File Documents Under Seal and DIRECTING Clerk of Court to file Reporter's Transcript pages 37-56, 66-99, 204.104.6, 218-49, 286, 354-88, and 574-86 under seal. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/19/2018 GRANTING 42 Respondent's request. Respondent to file a response to the petition by and including 5/18/2018. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/19/18 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 11/30/17 38 are ADOPTED in full; Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 24 is DENIED; Respondent is directed to file a responsive pleading within thirty days from the date of this order; and The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
38
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/30/2017 RECOMMENDING 24 Motion to Dismiss be denied and respondent be directed to file a responsive pleading within 30 days from the date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/21/2017 GRANTING 35 Request for Enlargement of Time. Respondent to file a response to Petitioner's sur-reply on or before 9/6/2017. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/11/2017 VACATING the 7/13/2017 hearing on 24 Motion to Dismiss. Petitioner to file sur-reply addressing respondent's argument within 30 days from the date of this order. Respondent may file a response 14 days thereafter. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/22/2017 GRANTING 29 Request to Reschedule Motion Hearing. Hearing on 24 Motion to Dismiss continued to 7/13/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Respondent's reply to Petitioner's 27 Opposition to be filed on or before 7/6/2017. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/26/17. granting 5 Motion to Proceed IFP. To the extent petitioner seeks leave to supplement the petition, such request is denied. Petitioner is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file an amended petition that includes all of his grounds for relief along with any pertinent additional information and argument in support of such claims. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/9/16 ORDERING that petitioner's motions for counsel (ECF No. 4 and 8 ) are granted. The Federal Defender is appointed to represent petitioner. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a cop y of this order on the Federal Defender, Attention: Habeas Appointment. Petitioner's counsel shall contact the Clerk's Office to make arrangements for copies of documents in the file. Within 30 days from the date of this order, petitioners counsel shall file and serve a status report addressing the timing and order of the following matters: a. Anticipated motions; b. Enumeration and resolution of unexhausted claims; and c. Possible amendment to the petition. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/5/16 ORDERING that Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gray v. Muniz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Oliver Gray | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: W.L. Muniz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
