Gipbsin v. Mccumber et al
Petitioner: Clarence A. Gipbsin
Respondent: McCumber, Los Angeles County Superior Court and Board of Prisons
Case Number: 2:2016cv01590
Filed: July 12, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/5/2016 DENYING petitioner's 33 motion for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
November 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 30 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/21/16 recommending that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus and all supplements thereto be dismissed. No certificate of appealability shall be issued. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
November 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/18/16 ordering petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 24 is granted. Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel 2 , 8 , 22 , 25 and 26 are denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings. Petitioner shall refrain from filing multiple requests for the same relief. Any such duplicative filings will be disregarded. (Plummer, M)
October 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/7/16 ORDERING that petitioner's motion for clarification (ECF No. 7 ) is GRANTED; Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 11 ) is DENIED withoutprejudice; The Cle rk of the Court shall provide petitioner with a copy of the in forma pauperis application used by this court; and petitioner shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a fully completedin forma pauperis application. Petitioners failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gipbsin v. Mccumber et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Clarence A. Gipbsin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: McCumber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Los Angeles County Superior Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Board of Prisons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?