Gummeson v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Connie Lynne Gummeson |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2016cv01611 |
| July 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Shasta |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
STIPULATION and ORDER for the award of Attorney fees signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/15/17. This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of SIX THOUSAND, SEVEN HUNDRED TEN DOLLARS ($6,710.00) in EAJA Attorney fees shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and Plaintiffs attorney, Jonathan O. Pea, Esq, may have relating to EAJA Attorney fees in connection with this action. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/15/2017 GRANTING 13 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 19 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; REVERSING the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security; REMANDING this matter for further proceedings consistent with this order. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/27/17 ORDERING that plaintiff's reply brief is DUE on 5/5/2017. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/9/17 ORDERING that the date for defendant to respond to plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 04/07/17. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 02/15/17 ORDERING that the date for defendant to respond to plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 03/03/17; the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/18/2016 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. The Clerk is directed to issue process. Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the United States Marshal a completed summons and copies of the complaint and to file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. (Jackson, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gummeson v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Connie Lynne Gummeson | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Omar Pena |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Carolyn B. Chen, GOVT |
| Represented By: | Bobbie J. Montoya, ss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
