Deere v. Unknown CDC - Employees Prison Law Offices
Petitioner: Arthur Ray Deere, Sr.
Respondent: Unknown CDC - Employees Prison Law Offices
Case Number: 2:2016cv01694
Filed: July 21, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Deborah Barnes
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/17/2021 ADOPTING in FULL 80 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's claims against the Prison Law Office are DISMISSED without leave to amend, and Judgment is ENTERED pursuant to the 8/19/2019 order 74 . CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 80 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/05/20 RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's claims against the Prison Law Office be dismissed without leave to amend; and judgment be entered pursuant to the 8/19/19 order. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 30 days.(Plummer, M)
May 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/21/2019 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign a district judge to this case and STRIKING plaintiff' 67 supplemental response from the docket. IT IS RECOMMENDED defendants' 61 motion for summary judgment be granted. Assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
March 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 03/20/19 ORDERING that within 10 days of the date of this order, defendant's counsel shall provide the undersigned with a courtesy copy of the complete transcript of plaintiff's deposition pursuant to local rule 133J. (Plummer, M)
January 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/2/2019 DENYING without prejudice 53 Motion to Amend; DENYING 54 Motion to Preserve Evidence; DENYING without prejudice 58 Motion for the Appointment of Counsel; and GRANTING 57 Motion for Extension of the Deadline to File Dispositive Motions. By 1/14/2019, parties to file any dispositive motions, as described in 29 Discovery and Scheduling order. (Henshaw, R)
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/6/18 DENYING 40 Motion for court-ordered testing, 44 Motion to Compel and 47 Motion for a fee waiver. (Coll, A)
August 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/21/2018 DENYING plaintiff's 33 motion for whistleblower protection and GRANTING plaintiff's 34 motion to re-open discovery. The discovery deadline, which included any motions to compel discovery, is CONTINUED to 10/8/2018; the deadline for other pretrial motions is CONTINUED to 12/15/2018. The interrogatories served by plaintiff on 5/21/2018 shall be deemed re-served as of the date of this order. Defendant shall serve a response to those interrogatories within 30 days. (Yin, K)
June 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/14/2018 DENYING without prejudice plaintiff's 31 motion for the appointment of counsel and for a delay of his deposition. (Yin, K)
July 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/25/17 ordering that within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file any second amended complaint. If plaintiff fails to do so, this case will proceed on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim regarding air quality against defendant Lizarraga as set out in the first amended complaint. (Plummer, M)
June 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/15/2017 GRANTING plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint. If plaintiff does not file an amended complaint in accordance with this order, this case will proceed on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim regarding poor air quality against defendant Lizarraga. The Clerk shall send plaintiff a copy of the prisoner complaint form used in this district. (Yin, K)
March 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Arthur Ray Deere, Sr. signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/27/2017. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forwar d to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Deere v. Unknown CDC - Employees Prison Law Offices
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Arthur Ray Deere, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Unknown CDC - Employees Prison Law Offices
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?