Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Barney Ray Lewis |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2016cv01705 |
| July 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/02/17 ORDERING that that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA for $4,750.00. This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/18/17, ORDERING that Plaintiff's 12 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Commissioner's 15 cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment for plaintiff. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/11/2017 ORDERING that within seven (7) days of this order, counsel for defendant shall file a completed Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment. Failure to timely comply with this order may result in sanctions. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/28/17 ORDERING that the time for plaintiff to file her reply to defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 04/19/17. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/6/2017 ORDERING the defendant's response to 12 Motion for Summary Judgment is now due by 3/8/2017. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/3/2016 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to serve the 5 Scheduling Order in Social Security Cases; ORDERING the plaintiff to submit to the United States Marshal, wi thin fourteen days, a completed 4 Summons and copies of the 1 Social Security Complaint and to file a statement with the court of such service; DIRECTING the U.S. Marshal to serve all process without prepayment of costs within sixty days. (cc: U.S. Marshal) (Michel, G.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Barney Ray Lewis | |
| Represented By: | Shellie Lott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Bobbie J. Montoya, ss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
