Bonilla et al. v. California Highway Patrol, et al.
| Guillermo Bonilla and Sandra Amaya Bonilla |
| California Highway Patrol, McKenzie and Peterson |
| 2:2016cv01742 |
| July 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
MINUTE ORDER by District Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi on 6/7/2021: This Court will dispose of the Lodged Transcripts on 6/21/2021, unless: Defendants file a request for the Lodged Transcripts to be returned to Defendants' counsel; or any party fi les an objection to this Court's decision not to make the Lodged Transcripts part of the record in this case. The request or objection must be filed by 6/14/2021. Any party objecting to this Court's decision must set forth the reason(s) why the Lodged Transcripts should be made part ofthe record. Agalelei Elkington, Courtroom Manager. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER signed by District Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi on 5/13/2021 DISMISSING all of Plaintiffs' claims against Peterson pursuant to the 93 , 94 Order and DISMISSING Highway Patrol pursuant to the 93 Order. There being no remaining claims in this case, the Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to enter final judgment and close the case. CASE CLOSED. (Tupolo, A)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER signed by District Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi on 4/22/2021 GRANTING 75 Motion to Dismiss, subject to the Highway Patrol's filing of the supporting documentation described in this Order. If the Highway Patrol's submission complies with this Order, this Court will issue an order directing the Clerk's Office to terminate Peterson as a party and to close this case. The affidavit or declaration must be filed by 5/7/2021. (Tupolo, A)
|
|
Filing
60
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi on 07/10/18 ORDERING that a telephonic conference be held with counsel for the Parties to discuss modification of the current Scheduling Order.The Court Assistant shall arrange the conference call. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi on 2/16/2017 ORDERING that Plaintiffs are GRANTED a thirty (30) day continuance to file an amended complaint consistent with the Court's 1/17/2017 order. The amended complaint shall be filed no later than 3/16/2017. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
23
AMENDED ORDER signed by District Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi on 1/17/2017 GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART California Highway Patrol's 7 Motion to Dismiss Complaint. The Motion is GRANTED insofar as Plaintiffs' claims against the H ighway Patrol in Counts I and II are HEREBY DISMISSED, and their claim against the Highway Patrol in Count IV is HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Motion is DENIED insofar as the dismissal of Plaintiffs' claims against the Highway Patrol in Counts I and II are WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiffs' claim against the Highway Patrol in Count III. This Court GRANTS Plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint to address the defects in their claims against the Highway Patrol in Counts I and II. Plaintiffs do no have leave to make any other amendments to the Complaint. Plaintiffs shall file their amended complaint by 2/17/2017. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by District Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi on 1/6/17 ORDERING that the Highway Patrol's MOTION to Dismiss Complaint, filed 8/1/16, is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED insofar as Plaintiffs' claim s against the Highway Patrol in Counts I and II are HEREBY DISMISSED, and their claim against the Highway Patrol in Count IV is HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Motion is DENIED insofar as the dismissal of Plaintiff claims against the Hig hway Patrol in Counts I and II are WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the Motion is DENIED as to PlaintiffS' claim against the Highway Patrol in Count III. This Court GRANTS Plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint to address the defects in their claims against the Highway Patrol in Counts I and II. Plaintiffs do no have leave to make any other amendments to the Complaint. Plaintiffs shall file their amended complaint by 2/17/17. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
20
MINUTES for proceedings before District Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi on 12/20/16. Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for 1/18/2017 at 10:00 AM is VACATED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
