Perkins v. Adams, et al.
Plaintiff: Randy Perkins
Defendant: A. Adams and J. Mansour
Case Number: 2:2016cv01791
Filed: July 29, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Joaquin
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K. Delaney
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/17/22 APPOINTING Attorney Shahid Manzoor for Plaintiff. Appointed counsel shall notify Sujean Park via email at spark@caed.uscourts.gov if he has any questions related to the appo intment. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on Shahid Manzoor, Manzoor Law Firm, 3017 Douglas Blvd., Suite 104, Roseville, CA 95661. A Final Pretrial Conference SET for 11/18/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. All other dates and deadlines are VACATED. The parties shall meet and confer and file a joint Pretrial Statement no less than three weeks prior to the Final Pretrial Conference. (Kastilahn, A)
January 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/25/2022 ORDERING this matter is set for trial on 9/12/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. Trial briefs shall be filed no later than 14 days prior to the date of trial. The parties shall serve a copy of their exhibits upon one another no later than 30 days before trial. Any motions in limine shall be filed no later than 30 days before trial, oppositions to motions in limine shall be filed no later than 7 days before trial. Proposed voir dire and proposed jury instructions, if any, shall be filed not later than 7 days before the date set for trial.(Yin, K)
March 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/26/20 GRANTING 66 Motion to Modify the Further Scheduling Order. Her deadline to file a pretrial statement is 05/25/20. (Plummer, M)
February 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/6/2020 VACATING 62 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 63 Motion for Extension of Time; ORDERING Plaintiff to file and serve his separate pretrial statement on or before 3/4/2020; and ORDERING Defendant Adams to file and serve her separate pretrial statement on or before 3/25/2020. (Henshaw, R)
December 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/27/2019 DENYING as MOOT 61 Motion to Modify and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/13/19 DENYING 59 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Plummer, M)
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 06/12/19 ORDERING the Custodian to produce Randy Perkins on 9/19/19 at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom 25 before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Cust odian is ordered to notify the court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. The clerk of court shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian and Out-to-Court Desk. (cc: KJN and OTCD) (Plummer, M)
June 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/3/2019 ADOPTED in FULL 51 Findings and Recommendations, and GRANTING 40 Motion for Summary Judgment as to defendant Y. Mansour and DENIED as to Adams. (Reader, L)
January 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 51 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/22/2019 RECOMMENDING defendants' 40 motion for summary judgment be granted as to defendant Mansour and denied as to defendant Adams. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
May 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/23/2018 GRANTING 42 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff granted up to and including 7/6/2018, in which to file his opposition to 40 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Henshaw, R)
December 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/26/17 DENYING 35 plaintiff's motion. (Plummer, M)
October 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 34 AMENDED DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/11/2017 GRANTING plaintiff's 30 motion for court order and DENYING as moot defendants' 33 ex parte motion. The 3/30/2017 Discovery and Scheduling order is AMENDED to reflect that discovery is reopened and the discovery deadline is extended to 1/8/2018 and the dispositive motions deadline is extended to 4/9/2018. (Yin, K)
February 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/17/17 ORDERING that Plaintiff's motions filed February 3, 2017 (ECF No. 18 ) are DENIED; Defendant Adams's motion for extension of time (ECF No. 16 ) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc; C ounsel for defendants shall take all steps necessary to enlist assistance from the CDCR to obtain Dr. Mansour's current or last known address so that the court can direct the U.S. Marshal to serve process without further delay; The U.S. Mars hal shall maintain the confidentiality of all information provided by the CDCR pursuant to this order; Once the court receives defendant Mansour's address, the court will direct the U.S. Marshal to execute service of process. If counsel for defendants cannot provide this information within 30 days of the date of this order, counsel shall so notify the court; and the Clerk of Court is directed to forward a copy of this order to the United States Marshal.(Dillon, M)
August 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Randy Perkins signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/22/2016. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perkins v. Adams, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randy Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A. Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Mansour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?