Law v. Gripe, et al.
Plaintiff: Carlos Gilbert Law
Defendant: Gripe, S. Saelee, B Brown, Rubino, N. DeFilippis, J. Helmrich and M. Osman
Case Number: 2:2016cv01830
Filed: August 3, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 4/23/2018 ADOPTING 90 Findings and Recommendations in FULL; Plaintiff's 81 & 83 Motions for Summary Judgment are DENIED; Defendant Gripe's 84 MSJ is GRANTED for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and plaintiff's claim against her is DISMISSED without prejudice; Defendant Rubino's 84 MSJ is GRANTED. CASE CLOSED. (Fabillaran, J)
March 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 90 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/22/2018 RECOMMENDING 81 and 83 Plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment be denied; 84 Defendant Gripe's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and Plaintiff's claim against her be dismissed without prejudice, and 84 Defendant Rubino's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
January 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER ADOPTING 77 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 01/17/18 and DENYING plaintiff's 41 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; DENYING plaintiff's 44 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and plaintiff's 48 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Benson, A.)
November 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/20/2017 DENYING 67 Motion to Strike; ORDERING Clerk of Court to randomly assign a US District Judge to this action; and RECOMMENDING 41 and 44 Motions for Preliminary Injunctions be denied and 48 Motion for Summary Judgment be denied. Assigned and referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
July 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/27/2017 ORDERING defendants to file an opposition or other appropriate response to plaintiff's motions (ECF Nos. 41 , 44 ) within 7 days. (Yin, K)
February 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/6/17 ORDERING the Director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the trust account of Carlos Gilbert Law and forward payment to the court until the balance is paid in full. Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff's signed in forma pauperis affidavit to the Director of the CDC; and the Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the court. (cc CDC, Financial)(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Law v. Gripe, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Gilbert Law
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gripe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Saelee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rubino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: N. DeFilippis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Helmrich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Osman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?