Prentice v. Holland
||Terry Lynn Prentice
||August 8, 2016
||US District Court for the Eastern District of California
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 1, 2017
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/28/2017 RECOMMENDING that 12 Motion to Dismiss be granted and the 1 Petition be denied with prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections to F&R due within 21 days after service of these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|March 14, 2017
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/13/17 granting 8 request to file a late motion to proceed in forma pauperis and granting 9 Motion to Proceed IFP. The clerk of court is directed to refund petitioner his filing fee in the a mount of $5.00. The clerk of court is also directed to send petitioner, together with a copy of this order, a copy of respondent's motion to dismiss (7 pages) 12 . Within 21 days after service of this order, petitioner shall file and serve an opposition or statement of non-opposition to respondent's pending motion to dismiss. (cc: Financial) (Plummer, M)
|August 25, 2016
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/25/16 ordering petitioner shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk of the court shall send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. (Plummer, M)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?