Medina v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
||Jesus R. Medina
||Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
||August 12, 2016
||US District Court for the Eastern District of California
||Kendall J. Newman
||William B. Shubb
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 20, 2017
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/19/2017 GRANTING plaintiff's 27 motion to voluntarily dismiss. Plaintiff shall pay defendants' reasonable costs and fees associated with defendants pending motion and responding to plaintiff's motion to consolidate. Defendants shall submit a declaration specifying these fees and costs within fourteen days. Plaintiff may respond within seven days thereafter. Thereafter the matter will be submitted. Defendants' 26 unopposed dispositive motion is DENIED as moot. The court DENIES plaintiff's 31 ex parte consolidation request. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
|November 3, 2016
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/02/16 ORDERING that this case be RELATED to case number 2:16-cv-1907 KJM EFB and that this related case be REASSIGNED to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller and Magistrate Judge Ed mund F. Brennan for all further proceedings; any dates currently set in this case are VACATED. District Judge William B. Shubb and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman are no longer assigned to case. The case number on all future filings shall be: 2:16-cv-1910 KJM EFB (cc: WBS,KJN). (Benson, A)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?