Parker v. Sacramento County Police Department et al.
| Akika Parker |
| Sacramento County Police Department and Sacramento County Sheriff's |
| 2:2016cv01926 |
| August 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/27/2016 RECOMMENDING that the action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(b); and the Clerk of the Court be directed to close this case. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; with Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER AND ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/22/16 ORDERING that within 21 days of this order, plaintiff shall pay the Clerk $100.00 in monetary sanctions for failure to comply with the court's order. W ithin 21 days of this order, plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE in writing why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) based on plaintiff's failure to comply with the court's order and failure to prosecute the case. Within 21 days of this order, plaintiff shall file a first amended complaint in compliance with the court's 10/12/2016 order. Alternatively, and in lieu of paying the monetary sanctions, responding to the order t o show cause, and filing a first amended complaint, plaintiff may instead file a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice within 21 days of this order. Failure to comply with all terms of this order will result in dismissal of the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/12/2016 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 4 Amended Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend. Within 28 days of this order, plaintiff shall file either a first amended complaint in compliance with this order or a request for voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice. Failure to timely comply with this order may result in dismissal of the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/20/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED without prejudice; withi n 21 days, plaintiff shall either pay the applicable filing fee or submit a properly-completed amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply with this order by the required deadline may result in dismissal of the action. (Benson, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
