Ehringer v. State of California et al
| Orion S. Ehringer |
| State of California, Sierra County, Darden Bynum, Lisa Botzer, Sacramento County, Jetaum Stevens, Christophe Guillion, Karen V. Bantique, Mark Mayfield and Laurie Earl |
| 2:2016cv01955 |
| August 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/23/16 RECOMMENDING: to DENY as MOOT 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed, and that the Clerk be DIRECTED to close this case; ORDERING tha t all pleading, discovery, and motion practice in this action are stayed pending resolution of these findings and recommendations. Other than objections to the findings and recommendations or non-frivolous motions for emergency relief, the court will not entertain or respond to any pleadings or motions until the findings and recommendations are resolved. Referred to District Judge Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/16/2016 DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 4 Motion for Recusal. (Michel, G.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
