Giraldes v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al.
Larry Giraldes, Jr. |
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Scott Kernan and Moreland |
2:2016cv02139 |
September 7, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Deborah Barnes |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/28/2019 ORDERING plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants' 21 motion for summary judgment within 30 days of the date that he receives his dental records. (Yin, K) |
Filing 30 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 05/09/19 DENYING 29 plaintiff's request to schedule this matter for a settlement conference. Within 14 days of the filing date of this order counsel for defendants shall file and serve a sta tement indicating whether plaintiff has been provided with access to our copies of relevant portions of his dental records. If plaintiff has not received access to or copies of his dental records, defendants shall state why access or copies have not been provided. This filing should include any appropriate declarations. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 4/3/2019 ORDERING Counsel for Defendants to file a response to 26 Notice within 14 days. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/26/2019 DENYING as untimely plaintiff's 22 motion to compel and GRANTNG plaintiff's 23 motion for an extension of time. Plaintiff has 45 days to file and serve his opposition. Counsel for defendants is instructed to: (a) Contact the Litigation Coordinator at California State Prison, Sacramento to determine when plaintiff last reviewed his central file; and (b) Within fourteen days of the date of this order, file and serve a statement reflecting the findings of such inquiry, including all appropriate declarations. (Yin, K) |
Filing 17 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/27/2018 ADOPTING 12 Findings and Recommendations in full, DISMISSING Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim, and DISMISSING Defendants Scott Kernan and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation from this action. (York, M) |
Filing 12 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/09/18 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a District Judge. Plaintiff has stated a cognizable claim for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. Service is appropriate for defendants Moreland, Sturgess, Maciel, Hernandez and Robinson. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff 5 USM-285 forms, 1 summons, instruction sheet and a copy of the amended complaint 5 to be compl eted and returned with the Notice of Submission of Documents within 30 days. Also, RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim and defendants Kernan and CDCR be dismissed for the reasons stated in the court's 9/27/17 order 6 . Assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/27/2017 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Larry Giraldes, Jr. The Director of the CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department) (Henshaw, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.