IHC Health Services v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance et al
| IHC Health Services |
| Eskaton Properties |
| 2:2016cv02180 |
| September 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Stanley A Bastian |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by District Judge Stanley A Bastian on 4/13/17 ORDERING the above-captioned action (including, without limitation, all claims against the Defendants contained in Plaintiff's Complaint in this action) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE on the merits, each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs associated with this action and the dismissal of this action. CASE CLOSED (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/29/2016 GRANTING the unopposed 21 Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time; ORDERING Defendant Eskaton Properties to file a responsive pleading by either (1) twenty (20) days after the plaintiff's counsel is able to practice before this Court; or (2) 11/1/2016. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 14 Motion to Change Venue: case is transferred to the Eastern District of California as a more convenient forum. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 9/12/16 (alt)[Transferred from utd on 9/13/2016.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
