Rasuwl v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Almalik Rasuwl
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics Corp, Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Case Number: 2:2016cv02201
Filed: September 15, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 33 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Vince Chhabria on 12/23/16: This action is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each party will bear its own costs of this action. (Kaminski, H)
December 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER signed by District Judge Vince Chhabria on 12/1/16 ORDERING as discussed at the telephonic case management conference on November 29, 2016, this case is referred to the ADR Unit of the Northern District of California for a telephone conference to take place by January 15, 2017 to assess alternative dispute resolution options. The ADR Unit will notify the parties of the date and time the telephone conference will be held.(Becknal, R) (Main Document 30 replaced on 12/1/2016) (Becknal, R).
November 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 28 CIVIL MINUTES before District Judge Vince Chhabria on 11/15/16. A telephonic further case management conference is scheduled for 11/29/2016 at 02:30 PM. Both Plaintiff and Plaintiff counsel are to participate in the call. The proposed schedule in the CMS must be acceptable to Mr. Rasuwl.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
October 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Vince Chhabria on 10/26/16 ORDERING the parties to refer to the standing orders of Judge Chhabria. It is FURTHER ORDERED that all hearing dates presently scheduled are VACATED and must be RESCHEDULED consistent with this order and the applicable rules. (Butolph, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rasuwl v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Almalik Rasuwl
Represented By: Charles Rene Houssiere, NCAED
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Represented By: Nicholas Neil Deutsch, NCAED
Represented By: Wayne Allen Wolff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stryker Corporation
Represented By: Nicholas Neil Deutsch, NCAED
Represented By: Wayne Allen Wolff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stryker Sales Corporation
Represented By: Nicholas Neil Deutsch, NCAED
Represented By: Wayne Allen Wolff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?