Bayhi v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Claudia Bayhi |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2016cv02273 |
| September 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/29/18, ORDERING that Plaintiff's 25 motion for an extension to time is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations on or before 4/26/2018. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/27/2018 DIRECTING the Clerk to randomly assign a U.S. District Judge to this case. Judge William B. Shubb assigned. It is hereby RECOMMENDED that 19 Motion for Summary Judgment be denied, 20 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment be granted, the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be affirmed, and this case be closed. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Fabillaran, J)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/03/17 ORDERING that within 21 days, plaintiff shall file a motion for summary judgment and/or remand; and plaintiff is cautioned that the failure to comply with this order may result in an order dismissing this action. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 09/11/17 ORDERING that plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE in writing, within 21 days, for failing to file a timely motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff may comply with this order by filing a motion for summary judgment. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/30/2016 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue process and to serve upon plaintiff the undersigned's Scheduling Ord er. Within fourteen (14) days, plaintiff shall submit service documents to the United States Marshal. Within five (5) days after submitting the necessary documents to the United States Marshal, plaintiff shall file in this court a declaration stating said documents have been submitted. The United States Marshal is directed to serve process without prepayment of costs not later than sixty (60) days from the date of this order. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bayhi v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Claudia Bayhi | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | C. Hay-Mie Cho |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
