Fischl v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Daniel Fischl
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2016cv02320
Filed: September 28, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 12/18/18 GRANTING 25 Motion for Attorney Fees, AWARDING plaintiff EAJA attorney's fees in the amount of $2,456.79, payable directly to plaintiff by the Commissioner within 65 days. (Coll, A)
October 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 23 STIPULATION and ORDER REMANDING CASE to Commissioner of Social Security signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/27/17. (Kaminski, H)
October 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/27/2017 GRANTING Defendant's 14 day Extension of Time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Filing deadline 11/8/2017. (Hunt, G)
September 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/11/2017 ORDERING the Commissioner of Social Security to file an Opposition to 16 Motion for Summary Judgment by 10/25/2017. (Michel, G.)
August 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/23/17: Plaintiff's time to file a motion for summary judgment brief is extended to August 25, 2017. (Kaminski, H)
August 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/10/2017 ORDERING that plaintiff's time to file a motion for summary judgment brief is EXTENDED to 8/18/2017. (Reader, L)
February 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/10/2017 GRANTING 3 Plaintiff' Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve on plaintiff the undersigned's scheduling order in social security case s; the Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal, Sacramento, CA; within 15 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM a completed summons and copies of the complaint and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM; the USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order.(Reader, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fischl v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Fischl
Represented By: Jesse S. Kaplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?