Bobo v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Charles Lewis Bobo |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2016cv02337 |
| September 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/21/18 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. F&R referred to United States District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/16/18, ORDERING that Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than 2/2/2018, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-oppositi on to the pending motion. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion, or a statement of non-opposition thereto, no later than 2/2/2018. Defendant may file a reply to plaintiff's opposition, if any, on or before 2/16/2018. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/17/2017 ORDERING that the Clerk is DIRECTED to mail to plaintiff a new consent form. Plaintiff is directed to complete and submit the form within 30 days. On the form, plaintiff shall clearly i ndicate whether he consents to proceed before the assigned magistrate judge or requests reassignment to a district judge. Failure to return the form within 30 days may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/12/2016 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve scheduling order. Within fourteen days from the date of this order, pl aintiff shall submit to the United States Marshal an original and five copies of the completed summons, five copies of the complaint, and five copies of the scheduling order, and shall file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than sixty days from the date of this order. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bobo v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charles Lewis Bobo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
