Langston v. Frantzen et al
| Walter Shane Langston |
| A. Frantzen and California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation |
| 2:2016cv02364 |
| October 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Madera |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/30/2017 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/20/2017 DENYING plaintiff's 6 application to proceed IFP; and plaintiff shall submit, within 21 days, the appropriate filing fee. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/6/16 ORDERING that plaintiff has 30 days from the date of service of this order to submit eitherthe filing fee or the IFP application. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail to plaintiff a form application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
