Kline v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Andria Kline |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2016cv02426 |
| October 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/29/2018 DENYING plaintiff's 20 Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTING the commissioner's 21 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment is entered for the Commissioner. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
26
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/7/2017 RECOMMENDING that 20 Motion for Summary Judgment be denied, 21 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and that judgment be entered for the Commissioner. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Hunt, G)
|
|
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/13/2017 ORDERING plaintiff to file a reply to 21 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment before 7/28/2017. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/10/2017 DISCHARGING the 16 Order to Show Cause; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to serve a copy of the 5 Scheduling Order on the plaintiff; ORDERING the plaintiff to file a Motion for Summary Judgment by 5/12/2017; MODIFYING the scheduling ordering accordingly. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/22/2017 ORDERING the plaintiff to show cause, in writing, by 4/4/2017, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/13/2016 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases. Wi thin fourteen days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the United States Marshal a completed summons and copies of the complaint and to file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than sixty days from the date of this order. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kline v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andria Kline | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Bobbie J. Montoya, ss |
| Represented By: | Sundeep R. Patel, GOVT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
