Hicks v. Arya

Plaintiff: Michael J. Hicks
Defendant: Afshin Arya
Case Number: 2:2016cv02465
Filed: October 14, 2016
Court: California Eastern District Court
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Referring Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 8, 2018 63 Opinion or Order of the Court FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/8/2018 RECOMMENDING 61 Motion for Preliminary Injunction be denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
May 17, 2018 60 Opinion or Order of the Court FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/16/18 RECOMMENDING that Defendant Aryas summary judgment motion 46 on the grounds that plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies as to his claims regarding h epatitis C and Celebrex be granted; defendant Aryas summary judgment motion on the grounds that plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies as to his claim regarding cervical traction be denied; defendants summary judgment motion as to the me rits of plaintiffs claim regarding cervical transfer be denied without prejudice to renewal at a later stage of these proceedings. Plaintiffs motion to file a second amended complaint 47 be granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs motion to f ile a second amended complaint raising new claims regarding treatment for hepatitis C and denial of adequate pain medication be denied. Plaintiffs motion to file a second amended complaint be granted as to his claims alleging that defendants Arya, Bo denheimer, Hopkins and Felder denied his request to be transferred in order to receive cervical traction. In the alternative, plaintiffs claims that defendants Bodenheimer, Sahota, Knipp and Hopkins denied plaintiff adequate pain medication, containe d in the proposed second amended complaint, be dismissed for failing to state potentially colorable claims for relief. Motions 46 and 47 referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) Modified on 5/17/2018 (Plummer, M).
December 12, 2017 54 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 12/11/17 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 8/23/17 38 are ADOPTED IN FULL; and Plaintiff's Motion to Amend 26 is GRANTED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
December 6, 2017 53 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 12/4/2017 ADOPTING 40 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 32 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Hunt, G)
August 24, 2017 40 Opinion or Order of the Court FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/24/17 recommending that plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief 32 be denied. MOTION for PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 32 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
August 23, 2017 39 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/23/2017 DENYING 24 Motion to Compel but for interrogatory no. 7; DENYING 27 Motion to Compel; and DENYING 35 Motion for Extension of Time to Conduct Discovery. Plaintiff to serve defendant with a further response to interrogatory no. 7 within 14 days of the date of this order. (Henshaw, R)
May 9, 2017 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 05/09/17 ORDERING that the 19 03/16/17 Order of the Magistrate Judge is AFFIRMED; the 22 Motion for Reconsideration is terminated. (Benson, A)
March 2, 2017 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER REFERRING CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR PROJECT AND STAYING CASE FOR 120 DAYS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/2/2017. The parties shall file the attached notice re settlement conference within 30 days of this order. The assigned DAG shall contact Courtroom Deputy, Matt Caspar, within 30 days to schedule a settlement conference. Each party shall submit a confidential settlement conference statement at least 7 days prior to the conference. If settlement is reached, the parties shall file a Notice of Settlement. The Clerk shall serve copies of (a) plaintiff's complaint, (b) the screening order, and (c) the instant order, on Supervising DAG Monica Anderson. (cc: Monica Anderson) (Yin, K)
December 29, 2016 7 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/29/16 ORDERING the Director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the trust account of Michael J. Hicks and forward payment to the court until the balan ce is paid in full. Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff's signed in forma pauperis affidavit to the Director of the CDC; and the Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the court. (cc CDC, Financial)(Dillon, M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hicks v. Arya
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael J. Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Afshin Arya
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?