Carmichael v. Sacramento Regional Transit et al.
Plaintiff: Gina Diane Carmichael
Defendant: Sacramento Regional Transit, Corinna De La Torres, Mike Seo and Alan Bertram
Case Number: 2:2016cv02476
Filed: October 17, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/20/2018 ORDERING that the court CERTIFIES that Plaintiff's appeal is not taken in good faith. The clerk's office is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Ninth Circuit. (cc: USCA) (Zignago, K.)
January 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDERING and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/8/2018 VACATING the 1/10/2018 Hearing on 15 Motion to Dismiss. It is hereby RECOMMENDED that 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 Second Amended Complaint be dismissed without leave to amend and the 15 Motion to Dismiss be denied as moot. Objections due within 14 after being served with these findings and recommendations. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. (Donati, J)
September 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/28/17 ORDERING Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is GRANTED;Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend, as provided herein;the 10/4/17 hearing on defendants Sacramento Regional Transit, Corinnna DeLa Torres, Mike Seo, and Alan Bertram's motion to dismiss is VACATED; Defendants Sacramento Regional Transit, Corinnna De La Torres, Mike Seo, and Alan Bertrams motion to dismiss 6 and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 7 are DENIED as moot; and Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint. (Becknal, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carmichael v. Sacramento Regional Transit et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gina Diane Carmichael
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sacramento Regional Transit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corinna De La Torres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike Seo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alan Bertram
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?