Baxter v. California Forensic Medical Group et al
Anthony Harrison Baxter |
California Forensic Medical Group, Shasta County Sheriffs Department, Tom Bosenko and Shasta County |
2:2016cv02495 |
October 19, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Shasta |
Kendall J. Newman |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/10/17 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/05/16 denying 11 Motion to Amend. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 12 is denied. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/1/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's 2 request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with 30 days leave to amend.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/9/16 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. Plaintiffs failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.