Calloway v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
| Jamisi Jermaine Calloway |
| California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, L. Donnelly, A. Poythress, M. Lowe, E. Facio, A. Adams, G. Williams, D. Julie Jacobs, J. Wang and C. McCabe |
| 2:2016cv02532 |
| October 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| William B. Shubb |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/8/2023 ADOPTING in FULL 56 Findings and Recommendations. The claims identified as defective in the 7/25/2023, Findings and Recommendations are DISMISSED, resulting in the dismissal of defendants: C DCR, D. Chanden, Chief Medical Executive, M. Cross, S. Davis, Davita Healthcare, Inc., Irene Doe, R. Hewitt, Doe Ko, J. Lewis, N. Malakkla, R. Recarey, C. Russell, San Joaquin General Hospital, San Joaquin Kidney Clinic, Total Renal Care, Inc., Doe W hite, A. Adams and J. Biggs. This action shall proceed on the 4th Amended Complaint on Plaintiff's claims identified in the Court's 7/25/2023, service order, ECF No. 57 , as cognizable.This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further pre-trial proceedings.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
56
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 7/25/2023 RECOMMENDING that the claims identified be dismissed and that this action proceed on 40 Fourth Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, on Plaintiff's claims identified in the accompanying service order as cognizable. Referred to Senior Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/17/2023 DENYING plaintiff's 54 request for the appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/4/2022 DENYING 47 Motion for Reconsideration; AFFIRMING 44 Order. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 06/29/22 GRANTING 48 Motion for Extension of Time. The 49 Objections filed 06/28/22 are DEEMED TIMELY. (Licea Chavez, V)
|
|
Filing
45
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 06/13/22 RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief 41 be denied. Motion 41 referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/3/2022 DENYING 43 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/5/21 DENYING 37 The motion for reconsideration. The Magistrate Judge's 8/13/21, order is AFFIRMED. No further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered. Plaintiff shall file a fourth amended complaint consistent with the Magistrate Judge's 8/13/21 order, within 30 days of the date of this order.(Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 8/13/2021 DISMISSING 34 Third Amended Complaint with leave to amend; GRANTING Plaintiff 30 days of the date of this order to file a fourth amended complaint; and ORDERING Clerk to send Plaintiff a copy of 33 Order with this present order. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 06/09/21, ORDERING that plaintiff may file a first amended complaint within 30 days of the date of service of this order.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 10/1/2019 DISMISSING plaintiff's first amended complaint with leave to amend; and plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint within 30 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/13/2019 DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend and plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within 30 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/11/19 VACATING 10 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 15 Motion for Extension of time; and GRANTING 2 , 12 , 16 Motions to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory fili ng fee of $350.00 for this action. Also, DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Jamisi Jermaine Calloway. CDC shall collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial). (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 12/6/18 DIRECTING plaintiff to submit a certified copy of the prison trust account within 30 days of the date of this order. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
10
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 08/07/18 RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 be denied and that plaintiff be required to pay the full filing fees for this action. MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 2 referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Transferring Case to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/21/16. (Verduzco, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
