Brooks et al v. FCI Lender Services, Inc. et al
| John Brooks and Laura Brooks |
| FCI Lender Services, Inc., MDJ Properties, LLC, Bucks Financial, LLC, SN Serving Corporation, Madison Management Services, LLC, California TD Specialists, Homecoming Financial, LLC and Ocwen Loan Servicing |
| 2:2016cv02598 |
| October 31, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/19/2018 GRANTING 53 Motion to Remand and REMANDING CASE to Placer County Superior Court. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. Certified copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/5/2017 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' 39 , 40 Requests for Substitution of Attorney are GRANTED and the substitution of counsel is APPROVED. This action is REFERRED to the assigned distric t judge for all further proceedings, except for discovery motions and matters otherwise appropriately referred to the assigned magistrate judge under the court's Local Rules. All dates presently scheduled before Judge Newman are VACATED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/24/2017 ORDERING Plaintiffs' shall have until 6/8/2017, to file a First Amended Complaint. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/19/17 ORDERING that Defendant OCWEN is DISMISSED from this action with prejudice pursuant to its stipulation with plaintiffs (ECF No. 34 ); Plaintiffs and Ocwen shall bear their own fees and costs, including all attorneys' fees, incurred in connection with this action. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
33
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/10/2017 ORDERING Plaintiffs shall have until 4/24/2017 to file First Amended Complaint. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 01/23/2017 GRANTING Defendant FCI's 8 Motion to Dismiss IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: (a) Plaintiffs' first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth, and thir teenth causes of action are DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE to amend to the extent they are asserted against defendant FCI; (b) Plaintiffs' eleventh, twelfth, fourteenth, and fifteenth causes of action are DISMISSED WITH LEAVE to amend insofar as they a re asserted against defendant FCI; within 45 days of the date of this order, plaintiffs SHALL FILE either an amended complaint in accordance with this order or a request for voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i); DENYING Defendant FCI's 9 Motion to Strike; DENYING AS MOOT SN Servicing Corporation's 20 Motion to Dismiss; and VACATING the 3/16/2017 Initial Scheduling Conference. The court will reschedule this conference at a later date if the court deems it necessary. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/18/2017 GRANTING 24 Request for Telephonic Appearance. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/27/2016 ORDERING that Defendant shall have until 1/23/2017, to file and serve its response to Plaintiffs' Complaint in this action. (Jackson, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
