Vail v. City of Sacramento
Plaintiff: Terrence Vail
Defendant: City of Sacramento
Case Number: 2:2016cv02673
Filed: November 10, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Deborah Barnes
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER ADOPTING 56 Findings and Recommendations signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/07/19 GRANTING in PART defendant's 37 Motion to Dismiss; DISMISSING the 33 06/21/18 amended complaint's claims arising under federal law wit hout leave to amend; DECLINING to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the amended complaint's state law claims; DISMISSING the amended complaint's state law claims without prejudice; DENYING 49 Motion to Amend the Complaint; DENYING 50 Motion for Default Judgment and DENYING 54 Motion for Default Judgment. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)
September 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/24/2019 DENYING without prejudice 61 Motion for Declarative Judgment, to renewal and the 9/27/2019 hearing is VACATED. (Reader, L)
August 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 07/31/19 ORDERING this case to be randomly ASSIGNED a District Judge; CASE ASSIGNED to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes; RECOMMENDI NG that the 37 Motion to Dismiss be granted in part; that the 33 06/21/18 amended complaint's claims arising under federal law be dismissed without leave to amend; that the 49 Motion for Leave to Amend be denied; that the 50 Motion for Default Judgment be denied; that the 54 Motion for Default Judgment be denied and this action closed. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Benson, A.)
April 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/29/19. Within fourteen days of the date of this order, Plaintiff provide the court with a current mailing address; and Plaintiff is cautioned that the failure to comply with this order in a timely manner may result in the dismissal of this action. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
January 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/7/2019 GRANTING 41 Motion for Extension of Time and CONTINUING 37 Motion to Dismiss Hearing to 2/15/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to 37 Motion to Dismiss on or before 2/1/2019. Plaintiff is cautioned that the failure to timely comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action. (Huang, H)
October 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/15/18 ORDERING that within 14 days from the date of this order, the court will issue plaintiff an order to show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed due to plaintiff's lack of prosecution-unless defendant has filed a responsive pleading. If defendant has filed a responsive pleading, the court will forgo such an order, and plaintiff should respond to defendant's pleading accordingly. (Kastilahn, A)
May 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/31/2018 DISCHARGING 29 Order to Show Cause and DIRECTING Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 21 days of the date of this order. (York, M)
May 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/10/2018 ORDERING that plaintiff show cause in writing within 14 days of the date of this order as to why this case should not be dismissed. (Hunt, G)
February 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/5/18 GRANTING 16 Motion to Dismiss: Plaintiff's November 10, 2016 complaint 1 is dismissed with leave to amend. Within twenty-eight days from the date of this order, an amended complaint shall be filed that cures the defects noted in this order. (Kaminski, H)
July 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/24/2017 ORDERING Plaintiff SHOW CAUSE in writing within fourteen days of the date of this order as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution; CONTINUING 16 Motion to Dismis s to 8/25/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes; On or before 8/11/2017; plaintiff shall file a statement of opposition or non-opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss; and Plaintiff is cautioned that the failure to timely comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. (Washington, S)
June 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/22/17. ORDERING that the July 7, 2017 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is VACATED.(Becknal, R)
May 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 05/26/17 ORDERING defendant to SHOW CAUSE in writing within 14 days as to why defendant should not be sanctioned for failing to appear at the 05/26/17 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference. The (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is CONTINUED to 7/7/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. (Benson, A)
May 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CONSENT ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/22/2017 REASSIGNING CASE for all purposes, including the entry of final judgment, to Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes; VACATING all dates and hearings set before Judge John A. Mendez; ORDERING that all documents filed hereafter bear case number: 2:16-cv-02673 DB (PS). (Michel, G.)
April 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 4/3/17 ORDERING that Plaintiff Show Cause in writing within fourteen days as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution; the 4/7/17 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is CONTINUED to Friday, 5/26/17, at 10:00 a.m., at the US District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, CA, in Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned; On or before 5/12/17, plaintiff shall file a Status Report in compliance with the 2/27/17 order; and Plaintiff is cautioned that the failure to timely comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. (Becknal, R)
February 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/27/17 ORDERING that a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is SET for 4/7/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before 3/24/2017, and defendant shall file and serve a status report on or before 3/31/2017. (Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vail v. City of Sacramento
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terrence Vail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Sacramento
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?