Davenport v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Latisha Shamond Davenport |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2016cv02729 |
| November 17, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/11/2018 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28:2412(d), in the amount of $6,000.00; this amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28:2412(d). (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/27/2018 GRANTING 19 Motion for Summary Judgment, DENYING 22 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and REMANDING this matter for further proceedings consistent with this order. CASE CLOSED. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/18/2017 ORDERING that Defendant shall have a 14 day extension of time to 9/4/2017, to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/16/2017 ORDERING the plaintiff to file a Motion for Summary Judgment by 7/19/2017; MODIFYING the Court's Scheduling Order accordingly. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/4/2017 ORDERING that the time for plaintiff to file her Opening Brief is EXTENDED to 6/19/2017. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/13/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve scheduling order in social security cases. Within 15 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the United States Marshal a completed summons and copies of the complaint and to file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than sixty days from the date of this order. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davenport v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Latisha Shamond Davenport | |
| Represented By: | Jacqueline Anna Forslund |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Chantal Jenkins |
| Represented By: | Bobbie J. Montoya, ss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
