Nilsen v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
Plaintiff: John Nilsen
Defendant: California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, State of California, J. Lewis and E. Baliton
Case Number: 2:2016cv02733
Filed: November 17, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Amador
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K. Delaney
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/16/2018 ORDERING the Clerk to assign a district court judge to this case and RECOMMENDING defendant Lewis's 9 motion to dismiss be granted, and this case be closed. Assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
June 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/9/2017 ORDERING opposition to 9 motion to dismiss be filed by 7/24/2017, pursuant to 10 stipulation of the parties. (Henshaw, R)
April 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 04/03/17 ordering the clerk of the court shall issue and send plaintiff a summons for defendant Lewis. The clerk shall also send plaintiff the form "Consent to proceed before United States Magistrate Judge" with this order. Plaintiff shall complete service of process on the defendant Lewis within 60 days. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order and a copy of the form "Consent to Proceed before United States Magistrate Judge" on defendant Lewis at the time the summons and complaint are served. Defendant Lewis shall reply to the complaint within the time provided in FRCP 12(a). (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nilsen v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Nilsen
Represented By: William L. Schmidt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. Baliton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?