Crudup v. Pleasant Valley State Prison et al
Plaintiff: Michael Crudup
Defendant: Pleasant Valley State Prison and California Department of Corrections
Case Number: 2:2016cv02748
Filed: November 21, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Bernardino
Presiding Judge: Deborah Barnes
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 03/20/19 RECOMMENDING that the second amended complaint 15 be dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a potentially cognizable claim; and the Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
December 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 12/10/2018 GRANTING 13 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff is GRANTED up to and including 2/28/2019, in which to file a second amended complaint. (Huang, H)
November 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/15/18 ORDERING plaintiff's first amended complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the prisoner complaint form used in this district. (Plummer, M)
November 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/26/2017 ORDERING, within 30 days, plaintiff shall comply with the court's previous order entered on 10/6/2017 and file an amended complaint within 30 days; or plaintiff shall show good cause why he cannot comply with the order. Plaintiff is warned that failure to timely comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.(Yin, K)
October 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/05/17 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff a copy of the prisoner complaint form used in this district. (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crudup v. Pleasant Valley State Prison et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Crudup
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pleasant Valley State Prison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?