Johnson v. Halk et al
Scott Johnson |
Robert Halk and Michelle Halk-Hodgkin |
2:2016cv02794 |
November 24, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Kendall J. Newman |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/16/2017 STAYING this action and REFERRING this matter to the court's Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program; ORDERING the parties to contact the court's VDRP Administrator within fourtee n (14) days; DIRECTING the parties to carefully review and comply with Local Rule 271 regarding specifications and requirements of the VDRP; ORDERING the parties to jointly file a VDRP Completion Report within fourteen (14) days after completion of the VDRP session; ORDERING that any objections be filed within seven (7) days. (cc: VDRP) (Michel, G.) |
Filing 16 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/26/2017 ORDERING that the 11 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 11 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 04/12/17 ORDERING the parties are ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE, within 7 days, why they should not be sanctioned, either in the amount of $250 each for failing to comply with court's order, or with dismissal, or both. (Benson, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.