Argon v. CDCR et al
| Francisco Argon |
| CDCR and BPH |
| 2:2016cv02826 |
| November 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Allison Claire |
| William B. Shubb |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/4/17 ORDERING that the December 15, 2016 order and findings and recommendations (ECF No. 6 ) are VACATED. Petitioner's request for unspecified relief (ECF No. [3 ]) is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the prisoner complaint form used in this district.IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed. No certificate of appealability shall issue. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/14/16 ORDERING that petitioner's request for unspecified relief (ECF No. 3 ) is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the pris oner complaint form used in this district. It is RECOMMENDED that Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed. No certificate of appealability shall issue. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
