Flynt et al v. Harris et al
| Larry C. Flynt, Haig Kelegian, Sr. and Haig T. Kelegian, Jr. |
| Kamala D. Harris, Wayne J. Quint, Jr., Bureau of Gambling Control, Jim Evans, Tiffany Conklin, Roger Dunstan, Lauren Hammond and Trang To |
| 2:2016cv02831 |
| November 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| John A. Mendez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 08/10/22 DENYING Plaintiffs' 86 Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTING Defendants' 94 Motion for Summary Judgment. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/1/2021 ORDERING Joint Mid-Litigation Statement due by 3/11/2022. Discovery due by 3/25/2022. Dispositive Motions filed by 5/6/2022, and Dispositive Motion Hearing is 6/28/2022. Final Pretrial Confe rence set for 8/26/2022 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez, and Jury Trial set for 11/14/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. The Court authorizes the filing of the Third Amended Complaint, and the Court ORDERS that Defendants' responsive pleading shall be due 30 days after the Third Amended Complaint is filed. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
75
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/13/2021 ORDERING Joint Mid-Litigation Statement Filing due 11/10/2021. Discovery due by 11/24/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 1/7/2022. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/22/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. Jury/Bench Trial set for 7/11/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/13/2021 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 59 Motion to Dismiss. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
56
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/18/2020 EXTENDING the deadline for the plaintiffs to file a Further Amended Complaint to 8/6/2020, and the last day for the defendants to file a Responsive Pleading is 8/26/2020.(Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/12/2020 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 50 Motion to Dismiss. To the extent that Plaintiffs' dormant commerce doctrine claims rest upon the theory that Sections 19858 and 19858.5 directl y regulate or discriminate against interstate commerce, the Court DISMISSES them without prejudice. Plaintiffs lack standing to allege Sections 19858 and 19858.5 improperly discriminate against out-of-state investors. Moreover, their allegations that these provisions directly regulate interstate commerce fail as a matter of law. Plaintiffs do, however, adequately allege that Sections 19858 and 19858.5 indirectly regulate interstate commerce. To the extent that Plaintiffs' dormant commerce c laims rests upon this theory of liability, the Court DENIES 50 Motion to Dismiss. If Plaintiffs amend their complaint, they shall file an Amended Complaint within 20 days of this Order. Defendants' responsive pleading is due 20 days thereafter. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/26/17 GRANTING defendants' 33 Motion to Dismiss with prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/23/17, ORDERING that the Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 12/4/2017, and supplemental or rebuttal disclosure due by 12/18/2017. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 05/26/17 ORDERING that defendants' 19 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiffs shall file a First Amended Complaint within 20 days or this action will be dismissed. Defendants' responsive pleadings are due 20 days thereafter. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/23/2017 ORDERING that the time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint be extended for five days to 1/31/2017. (Washington, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
