Johnson v. Mather Point, LLC et al
Scott Johnson |
Mather Point, LLC and Thiara Enterprise |
2:2016cv02875 |
December 7, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Deborah Barnes |
John A. Mendez |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 STSTUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/14/2017 DISMISSING all "Doe" or other fictitiously-named defendants; ORDERING that all dispositive motions be filed by 3/13/2018 and that the hearing on such mo tions be held on 4/10/2018 at 01:30 PM; ORDERING that all discovery be completed by 1/26/2018; ORDERING the parties to disclose expert witnesses by 12/1/2017 and to disclose rebuttal experts by 12/8/2017; ORDERING the parties to file a joint mid-liti gation statement fourteen (14) days prior to the close of discovery; SETTING the Final Pretrial Conference for 5/25/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez; ORDERING the parties to file a joint pretrial statement se ven (7) days prior to the Final Pretrial Conference; SETTING the Jury Trial for 7/9/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez; CAUTIONING all parties that this Status Order will become final without further Order of Court unless objections are lodged within seven (7) days. (Michel, G.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.