Johnson v. Compton et al
| Scott Johnson |
| Larry D. Compton and El Monte Rents, Inc. |
| 2:2016cv02961 |
| December 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| John A. Mendez |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/9/2018 DENYING 37 Motion for Attorney Fees. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/27/2018 ORDERING that Plaintiffs ADA claim is DISMISSED AS MOOT. The Court DECLINES to retain supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Civil Rights Act claim and DISMISSED this claim without prejudice to refiling it in state court. Plaintiff's 30 motion for summary judgment is DENIED AS MOOT. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/2/18 ORDERING Upon review of the Stipulation to Take Defendant's Depositions After the Discovery Cutoff and good cause appearing, Plaintiff may re-notice the depositions of Larry D. Compton and Kelly Compton for May 17, 2018. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 04/07/17 ORDERING that defendant El Monte's 8 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. (Benson, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
