Cal-Pac Rancho Cordova, LLC et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
Cal-Pac Rancho Cordova, LLC, Capitol Casino, Inc., Lodi Cardroom, Inc. and Rogelio's, Inc. |
United States Department of the Interior, Sally Jewell and Lawrence S. Roberts |
2:2016cv02982 |
December 21, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Yuba |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Kendall J. Newman |
Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/6/2021 DENYING 31 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTING 35 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in Defendants' favor and close the case. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 30 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/18/19 MODIFYING the summary judgment briefing schedule as follows: Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support is due by 5/13/19; Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Combined Memorandum in Support and in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion is due by 7/12/19; Plaintiff's Reply in Support of their Motion and Opposition to Defendants' Cross-Motion is due 30 days later; Defendants' Reply on their Motion is due 30 days later; and Hearing on Cross Motions will be held 45 days after completion of briefing. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 28 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/1/2019 DENYING 22 Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record. (Washington, S) |
Filing 21 ORDER granting 20 Motion to modify the Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/17/17: Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum is Support due 45 days after the Court decides Plaintiffs& #039; Motion to Supplement. Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Combined Memorandum in Support and in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion due 45 days later. Plaintiff's Reply in Support of their Motion and Opposition to Defendants' Cross-Motion due 30 days later. - Defendants' Reply on their Motion due 30 days later. Hearing on Cross Motions 45 days after completion of briefing. (Kaminski, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.