Barker v. Osemwingie et al
Plaintiff: William Barker
Defendant: Osemwingie and Ramiscal
Case Number: 2:2016cv03008
Filed: December 23, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K. Delaney
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/16/2023 VACATING the 90 Findings and Recommendations, GRANTING the 93 Motion to Amend and DISMISSING the 97 Fifth Amended Complaint. CASE CLOSED. (Spichka, K.)
September 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 90 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/1/2022 RECOMMENDING that 88 Fourth Amended Complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and that this case be closed. Referred to Senior Judge John A. Mendez. Objections within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Huang, H)
April 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/7/2022 ORDERING plaintiff has 14 days to either file a fourth amended complaint to correct the error identified in this order or inform the court he wishes to proceed on the third amended complaint as is. If the court does not receive a response to this order, this matter will proceed on the third amended complaint. (Yin, K)
March 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/04/22, ORDERING plaintiff is granted 30 days within which to file a third amended complaint.(Plummer, M)
April 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/21/20 OVERRULING 77 plaintiff's objections to defendants' bill of costs. Defendants' bill of costs is approved and cost are awarded in the full amount of $1091.10. (Plummer, M)
March 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/19/20 GRANTING 63 Motion for Summary Judgment. This action is dismissed with prejudice. Judgement is entered for defendants. CASE CLOSED (Plummer, M)
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/23/19 GRANTING 68 the parties stipulated request to continue or vacate the 5/29/19 hearing. The 05/29/19 hearing on defendants' motion for summary judgment is vacated and the motion is submitted on the papers. (Plummer, M)
May 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 66 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/10/19 as to 63 Motion for Summary Judgment ( Motion Hearing set for 5/29/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney.) Defendants' reply due 5/22/19. (Plummer, M)
April 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/11/2019 and signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/24/2019 ORDERING Clerk of Court to reassign this case to the Honorable Carolyn K. Delaney with all documents hereafter filed to bear case No. 2:16-cv-3008 CKD and VACATING all currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge Mendez. (cc: JAM) (Henshaw, R)
April 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/4/2019 MODIFYING 53 Scheduling Order. The law and motion cut off date shall now be 5/22/2019. Any notices of motion and accompanying motion shall be filed on or before 4/24/2019, with the hearing noticed for no later than 5/22/2019. In all other respects, 53 Scheduling Order remains in full force and effect. (Henshaw, R)
January 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 58 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/8/2019 MODIFYING 53 and 56 Scheduling Orders as follows: The deadline for disclosing expert witnesses is 1/25/2019, with any rebuttal experts witness disclosures due by 2/22/2019. Expert discovery shall close on 3/22/2019. In all other respects, the 53 Scheduling Order remains in full force and effect. (Huang, H)
November 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/16/2018 IT IS SO ORDERED The deadline for disclosing experts is 1/3/2019, with any rebuttal experts witness disclosures due by 1/31/2019. Expert discovery shall close on 3/1/2019. Any discover y motions related to expert discovery must be noticed for the hearing to take place by this date and shall be brought in the same manner as motions related to non-expert discovery. In all other respects, the 3/26/2018 Scheduling Order remains in full force and effect. (Reader, L)
February 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/20/2018 ORDERING within 30 days, the parties shall confer and submit a joint status report and proposed schedule in accordance with this order. (See Order for Details)(Yin, K)
December 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/19/17 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed August 11, 2017 (ECF No. 42 ), are ADOPTED in full; Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order (ECF No. 9 ) is DENIE D; Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 32 ) is GRANTED; Counts One through Five and the portion of Count Six alleging defendant Ramiscal abandoned plaintiff are DISMISSED without leave to amend. The portion of Count Six related to the claim that defendants Osemwingie and Ramiscal misused the hoyer lift is DISMISSED with LEAVE TO AMEND; Plaintiff has thirty days from the filing of this order to file an amended complaint. (Becknal, R)
August 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 42 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/11/2017 RECOMMENDING plaintiff's 9 motion for TRO be denied; defendants' 32 motion to dismiss be granted; Counts One through Five and the portion of Co unt Six alleging defendant Ramiscal abandoned plaintiff be dismissed without leave to amend and the portion of Count Six related to the claim that defendants Osemwingie and Ramiscal misused the hoyer lift be dismissed with leave to amend; and plaintiff have 30 days from the District Judge's order ruling on these findings and recommendations to file an amended complaint. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
July 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/11/2017 ORDERING parties to each file a completed consent or request for reassignment form within 7 days of the date of this order. (Henshaw, R)
June 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/7/2017 ORDERING plaintiff shall have 14 days from the filing of this order to respond to defendants' 32 motion to dismiss. Defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed within 7 days thereafter. (Yin, K)
February 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/7/2017. Attorney Scottlynn J. Hubbard is substituted for pro se plaintiff William Barker.(Yin, K)
January 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/27/17 ordering plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint. (Plummer, M)
December 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/29/16 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the required fees in the amount of $400.00; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. (Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barker v. Osemwingie et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Barker
Represented By: Scottlynn J. Hubbard, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Osemwingie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ramiscal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?